Skip to content
Silicon Wok Hawker Heritage
Menu

The whole library

Figures

197 headline numbers. Each shows its kind: official (published by a public body), derived (worked out from official numbers), modelled (from the open model) or an assumption. “Proposed” marks the plan's own budget and design numbers.

Five numbers and a blank

The plan on one page

  • $19.68M

    4-year programme

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The net funding requirement for Year 0 to Year 3 at three pilot centres, summed from the four ledgers in Part VII.

    Sections: §the-plan · §7.1

  • $40M

    endowment target

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The Hawker Endowment's target by the end of Year 2.

    Sections: §the-plan · §7.6

  • 44

    Master Fellows

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Master Fellowships funded across Years 1–3 at the three centres (10, 16 and 18): one for each heritage-worthy stall in each centre's planning count, a ceiling (27 at Chinatown Complex, 8 at Geylang Serai, 9 at Tekka).

    Sections: §the-plan · §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.3 · the Budget Book, B.4 · the Budget Book, B.5

  • 88

    apprenticeships

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Apprentices funded across Years 1–3 at the three centres (20, 32 and 36), two for each Master Fellowship.

    Sections: §the-plan · §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.3 · the Budget Book, B.4 · the Budget Book, B.5

  • 26

    funded landings

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Graduate Landing Packages funded in Years 2 and 3 (10 and 16), about 30% of each centre's apprentices.

    Sections: §the-plan · §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.4 · the Budget Book, B.5

  • 3

    pilot centres

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Two Lighthouses, Chinatown Complex and Geylang Serai, open in Year 1 and Tekka beside them in Year 2, each with the full loop; five at most before the gate criteria.

    Sections: §the-plan · §6.3 · §6.5

  • 0

    cameras

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The quality standard uses no cameras, data feeds or league tables.

    Sections: §the-plan · §5.1

Budget

  • $906,598

    Year 0 net requirement

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Year Zero at both Lighthouses: the critical-illness pool, listening and co-design, pilot documentation, the stall baseline (a two-week till count at every consenting stall, by dish type), the evaluator's baselines and the Hawker Council's first election.

    Sections: §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.2

  • $4,629,249

    Year 1 net requirement

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Year 1, when the two Lighthouses launch the full loop, Tekka gets its trust deposits and its stall baseline, and the Regulars' List opens at every government hawker centre.

    Sections: §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.3

  • $6,706,257

    Year 2 net requirement

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Year 2, when Tekka opens beside the Lighthouses and their first graduates land.

    Sections: §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.4

  • $7,441,704

    Year 3 net requirement

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Year 3, three centres running the full loop; no part of it waits on the gate.

    Sections: §7.1 · the Budget Book, B.5

  • $19,683,808

    The four-year total

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The programme's total net requirement for Years 0–3 at three centres: $5,430,106 of operating budget, the Seed Bank's small part in the Buying Circles, the national Regulars' List and the stall baseline among it, and $14,253,702 of programme budget that reaches hawkers. The two Lighthouses alone would cost $16,224,542.

    Sections: §7.1

  • $5,586,777

    Old Airport Road, the fourth pilot centre, an add-on, over Years 0–3

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A stated add-on to the three-centre plan, costed at its own size, 168 stalls and 16 heritage-worthy: $274,516 in Year 1 (trust deposits and its stall baseline before it opens), $2,026,842 in Year 2 and $3,285,419 in Year 3.

    Sections: §7.1 · §6.3

  • $4,412,940

    Maxwell, the fifth pilot centre, an add-on, over Years 0–3

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A stated add-on to the three-centre plan, costed at its own size, 103 stalls and 13 heritage-worthy: $213,246 in Year 1, $1,636,325 in Year 2 and $2,563,369 in Year 3.

    Sections: §7.1 · §6.3

  • 29,683,525

    Four-year programme at five pilot centres, the most before the gate

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The three-centre plan plus Old Airport Road and Maxwell.

    Sections: §7.1 · §6.5

  • 72.4%

    Share of spend reaching hawkers directly

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Each year's ledger splits the operating budget, the institution's own burn, from the programme budget that reaches hawkers, centre by centre; this is the programme budget as a share of the four-year net requirement.

    Sections: §7.1

  • $113,000

    Operating burn a month

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The operating budget over Years 0–3, $5,430,106, spread over 48 months.

    Sections: §7.1

  • about $5.6M

    Year-3 spend with the two Lighthouses alone (downside mode)

    derivedproposed2026-10

    If the endowment campaign stalls at its first close, both Lighthouses keep running and Tekka defers: $5,624,989 in Year 3.

    Sections: §7.8

  • $416,570

    The Regulars' List over Years 1–3

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A coordinator; 800 listing visits over three years, each with a decal, a Registry page and a thank-you note; new decals for stalls that move up a grade; a booklet and map for every government centre; and the listing on the open price board: $132,750, $124,900 and $121,050 before contingency, in the operating budget.

    Sections: §3.6 · §7.1

Follow the Gift

  • $4.13M

    The programme a year from Year 4 at three pilot centres

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    From Year 4 each centre funds new Fellowships at a maintenance rate fed by the yearly at-risk count, about 10% of its planning count a year, against about $5.32M from the draw, the operating match and continuing gifts: at the central assumptions no year runs short.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.4 · §7.6 · §7.8

  • $5.7M

    Major gifts needed from donors and family foundations to close the $40M endowment on time

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    At the central assumptions, this is what major donors must give so that each close (Years 0, 1 and 2) is reached. It is the balancing item.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.1 · the Budget Book, B.9.4 · the Budget Book, B.6.1

  • $1.08

    Public money for every private dollar while the endowment is raised (Years 0–2)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Government carries the campaign. Public money here is the anchor, the match, the operating match, half of the Year 0 NHB grant and the tax forgone.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9 · the Budget Book, B.9.4

  • $3.6

    Private money for every public dollar in a typical later year (Year 6)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    After the campaign the ratio turns around: in Year 6, $3.43M of private money against $0.94M of public money.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9 · the Budget Book, B.9.4

  • 121%

    The endowment in Year 20, in today's dollars, as a share of its $40M target

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    From Year 4 the pilot centres fund new Fellowships at a maintenance rate, so a little under half of continuing gifts is spent and the rest joins the corpus, which ends well above its target in real terms.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.2

  • $0.42M, $1.05M and $1.41M

    The endowment's draw in Years 1, 2 and 3

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The model reproduces the draws printed in §7.6: 3.5% of the corpus, then of its three-year average.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9 · §7.6

  • 59%

    Chance the final $40M close is reached by the end of Year 2

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Share of 5,000 modelled futures in which fundraising lands on time, with the adopted investment policy (fixed-income core, 3.5% draw). In the worst tenth the campaign is $3.2M short.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.3

  • 71%

    Chance the corpus keeps its real value to Year 20: the adopted policy (fixed-income core, draw 3.5%)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Share of 5,000 modelled futures in which the endowment is still worth at least $40M in today's dollars in Year 20, while diners and partners keep giving.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.3 · the Budget Book, B.9.4 · §7.6

  • 34%

    Chance the corpus keeps its real value to Year 20 if all giving stops after Year 5, at a 3.5% draw

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The stress test: every diner, partner and company stops giving after Year 5. At 3.5% the corpus keeps its real value in only this share of 5,000 futures.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.3 · the Budget Book, B.9.4

  • 45%

    Chance the corpus keeps its real value to Year 20 if all giving stops after Year 5, at a 3% draw

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The same stress test with the draw cut to 3%: the reason the draw rule carries a trigger.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.3 · the Budget Book, B.9.4

  • $427 a month

    Rent rebate each heritage stall receives from its partner operator (20 hosted stalls)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Partner operators may meet up to half of their pledge as rent rebates, straight to the heritage stalls they host. Not matched, and no tax deduction.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.1 · the Budget Book, B.6.1

  • $7.56 to $8.86 an hour

    What the rent rebate does for an HDB-rented coffeeshop stall's net income per hour

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    From $7.97 to $9.27 an hour at about $427 a month; the lift is the rebate spread over the stall's working hours.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.1

Programme parameters

  • 50, 100 and 250

    Endorsements for Silver, Gold and Platinum on the Regulars' List; Bronze, the listing itself, needs 20

    assumptionproposed2026-10

    Or 10%, 20% and 50% of a stall's weekly orders placed by its regulars, at 1.5 orders a week each, whichever comes first, from Silver up. The unit is the order: a family's takeaway of several plates is one order. Grades only go up and never gate a Fellowship.

    Sections: §3.6 · Follow the Plate, D.4.2

  • 800

    Stalls on the Regulars' List by the end of Year 3

    assumptionproposed2026-10

    Ramped from 300 by the end of Year 1 and 600 by Year 2; about 12–15% of the more than 6,000 cooked-food stalls in government centres are assumed to be listed.

    Sections: §3.6 · §7.1

  • 120–200

    Listed stalls counted at risk by Year 3

    assumptionproposed2026-10

    Assumed at 15–25% of listed stalls; the count behind the pilot centres flagged 8 of 55 heritage-worthy stalls, a floor. Published only as national and per-centre totals, never naming a stall.

    Sections: §3.6

  • 10%

    New Master Fellowships a year from Year 4, once a centre's planning count has been offered

    assumptionproposed2026-10

    Fed by the yearly at-risk count, from hawkers' voluntary signals and public facts: three a year at Chinatown Complex and one each at Geylang Serai and Tekka.

    Sections: §7.8 · §7.1

  • $1,700

    Indicative cooked-food band, Class A centre (prime)

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The proposed fixed rent for a prime-centre cooked-food stall under rent bands and ballot.

    Sections: §2.2

  • $1,150

    Indicative cooked-food band, Class B centre

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The proposed fixed rent for a stall in a Class B centre; also the rent a Heritage Anchor coffeeshop unit would match.

    Sections: §2.2 · §2.4

  • $650

    Indicative cooked-food band, Class C centre

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The proposed fixed rent for a stall in a Class C centre.

    Sections: §2.2

  • $90,750

    Total Fellowship value over three years, CPF included

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Every Master Fellow receives the same package: a teaching year at $2,500 a month ($30,000), a 24-month stewardship at $1,000 a month ($24,000), a $15,000 completion grant, up to $15,000 of health security and employer CPF on the whole stipend, $6,750 at 12.5%, the 2026 rate for a Fellow over 60 (a Fellow under 60 would cost 16–17%).

    Sections: §4.2

  • ≈$20,000

    Expected cost of the Graduate Landing Package

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The expected cost of landing each graduate in a stall with rent relief, financed equipment and an income floor.

    Sections: §3.4

  • $2,220 a month

    Apprentice pay from July 2026, the Progressive Wage for a food or drink stall assistant ($2,360 from July 2027, $2,500 from July 2028), plus employer CPF

    officialproposed2026-10

    Seed Bank apprentices do an assistant's work at the master's stall, so they are paid an assistant's wage for all 18 months.

    Sections: §3.3 · Sources: Government accepts TCF recommendations on Food Services PWM 2026 to 2028 · Primary source

  • $80

    Hawker's co-pay for a relief cook ($40 for medical leave); the corps member earns the Progressive Wage for a cook for a day of at most 12 hours, with overtime beyond 8, about $212 a day in 2026

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The programme funds the gap between the hawker's co-pay and the relief cook's day rate.

    Sections: §2.7

Endowment

  • $15M

    Government anchor

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A one-time Government anchor gift to the Hawker Endowment.

    Sections: §7.6 · §7.7

  • $10M

    1:1 matching pool

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A public pool matching diners' and companies' gifts to the endowment dollar for dollar until the $10M is used.

    Sections: §7.6 · §7.7

  • $15M

    corporate & community giving

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The share of the endowment raised from companies and the public.

    Sections: §7.6

  • $12M

    first close at launch

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The endowment's first close; if the campaign stalls here, both Lighthouses keep running and Tekka defers.

    Sections: §7.6 · §7.8

  • $1.4M

    a year thereafter, at a 3.5% draw

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Once fully raised, the endowment yields about this much a year, kept in step with inflation, at a 3.5% draw from a corpus with a fixed-income core.

    Sections: §7.6

The ask

  • $66M a year

    Makan Vouchers, indicative and tunable

    derivedproposed2026-10

    $120 a year for about 550,000 households, on the existing CDC voucher system and outside the programme's books.

    Sections: §2.5 · §7.7

  • $120 a year

    Makan Voucher per eligible household

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The indicative yearly voucher for lower-income households, seniors and students.

    Sections: §2.5

  • about 550,000

    households receiving Makan Vouchers

    derivedproposed2026-10

    About 550,000 of Singapore's 1.49 million resident households would receive the voucher.

    Sections: §2.5 · Follow the Plate, D.7.3

  • 50 passes

    Apprentice Work Pass pilot, pilot centres and their clusters

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A pilot quota of foreign-apprentice passes tied to training in Singaporean hawker technique.

    Sections: §2.8 · §7.7

Succession

  • $63,000

    Goodwill at 15× monthly net (worked example: laksa stall, Class B centre)

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A laksa stall netting $4,200 a month would be valued at $63,000 of goodwill, paid off in about 50 months at the lesser of 8% of gross and 30% of net ($1,260 a month).

    Sections: §4.3

  • ≈ $3,200 / mortgage

    Expected first-loss cost, simulated (Succession Economics, E.1.4)

    modelled2026-10

    The expected cost to the programme of one Succession Mortgage for a stall like the paper's worked example. Averaged across every tendered stall with goodwill worth selling, weaker stalls included, it is about $6,500.

    Sections: §4.3 · Succession Economics, E.1.4

  • 2.5%

    Family Name Royalty, for ten years at most

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The share of gross revenue paid to a master's family whenever a business trades under the master's name, for ten years from its first month; the business may buy it out at any time at a published multiple.

    Sections: §4.4

  • about $5,500/year

    Royalty paid by a heritage stall grossing $220,000/year

    derivedproposed2026-10

    A busy heritage stall would pay the master's family this much a year for ten years, about $55,000 in all.

    Sections: §4.4

  • 6

    Completed Hawkers Succession Scheme transfers (4 in progress; Sep 2025)

    official2025-09

    Nearly four years after launch, few veterans had used the succession scheme.

    Sections: §1.2 · §1.3 · §2.3 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.5 · Sources: Written reply to parliamentary question on hawker stall subletting and Hawker Succession Scheme · Primary source

  • $951

    Succession payment at a typical stall under the adopted cap (§4.3)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The lesser of 8% of takings and 30% of verified net profit; it retires the goodwill in 4.2 years at 15 months of profit.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1

  • 4.2

    Payoff time at a typical stall under the adopted cap (15 months of profit)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Gentler payments for an ordinary stall keep the successor near the assistant's benchmark.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1 · §4.3

  • about 14%

    The 2.5% royalty as a share of a typical stall's profit

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Small beside sales but material to profit, so §4.4 starts it only once the mortgage is retired.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1 · §4.4

  • $564

    Successor's income if they keep only 90% of the master's customers, under the original terms

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Mortgage and royalty together would leave the successor almost nothing at a typical stall.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1

Rents and tenure

Training

Existing schemes

Hawkers and Social Protection: bottom line

Hawkers and Social Protection: costs

  • ≈ $8.3M

    Cost of July 2026's rent support for cooked-food stalls: $200 a month for six months across about 6,900 stalls (our arithmetic)

    derived2026-10

    The same sum each year would match every stallholder, at any age, up to $1,200 a stall a year. The match as proposed, for stallholders under 55 only, costs at most $4.1M a year.

    Sections: Hawkers and Social Protection, C.1 · §2.11.1 · §2.11.2 · Sources: Support for stallholders (rent support) · Primary source

  • up to $1,200 a year

    Retirement match per stallholder under 55 a year, on the stallholder's own CPF top-ups

    derivedproposed2026-10

    From 55 the existing Matched Retirement Savings Scheme already matches top-ups for those within its means tests.

    Sections: §2.11.1

  • $4.1M / year

    The match as proposed, for public-centre stallholders under 55 only: the most it costs a year (base case)

    derivedproposed2026-10

    Base scope of the Hawker Protection Floor: $1,200 a stall for stallholders under 55 in NEA and operator-run centres, all taking it up. From 55 the existing Matched Retirement Savings Scheme already matches top-ups.

    Sections: §2.11.1 · §2.11.2 · Follow the Plate, D.7.5 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • ≈ $7.9M

    Retirement match and hospital-cash cover, stretch case: every stallholder under 55, coffeeshops and food courts included, at 70% take-up

    derivedproposed2026-10

    The stretch scope of the Hawker Protection Floor, against at most about $4.1M a year for the base case (public centres only). Both are ceilings: fewer than half of stallholders are under 55.

    Sections: §2.11.2 · §2.11.1 · Follow the Plate, D.7.5 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • $200 / stall / month

    Rent support announced July 2026, for 6 months (Sep 2026–Feb 2027)

    official2026-07

    One-off rent support for stallholders in markets and hawker centres.

    Sections: Hawkers and Social Protection, C.4 · §2.11.1 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.7 · Sources: Support for stallholders (rent support) · Primary source

Worker blocs

Retirement

Work dynamics

Follow the Plate: bottom line

Follow the Plate: key results

  • 25%

    Income a private-coffeeshop hawker loses to a 10% rise in rent and fees

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Against 6% for a 10% rise in ingredient prices: the landlord's squeeze is the larger in five of six kinds of stall.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.5

  • 6%

    Income a private-coffeeshop hawker loses to a 10% rise in ingredient prices

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Ingredient rises hit every stall at once, so more of them reach the diner.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.5

  • 8% to 21%

    Income lost to a 3% fall in custom, by type of stall

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The hawker keeps only what is left, so a small fall in custom cuts income sharply.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.6

  • up to 76%

    Income lost to a 30% rent rise at renewal

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The worst case is a private coffeeshop, where a rent rise cannot be passed on to diners.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.6

  • $34.1M

    Cost of $200 a month per stall, stall-attached and made permanent, across 14,400 stalls

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Landlords would recapture $12.8M of it at renewal, $10.4M of that by operators and private owners.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.7.2

  • $12.6M

    Recaptured by landlords at renewal

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    About 37% of stall-attached support returns to landlords nationally (capture rates are assumptions).

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.7.2 · Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3

  • $10.3M

    Of which to operators and private owners

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The part of stall-attached support that leaks to private landlords, about 30% of the total.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.7.2 · Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3

  • $15.60

    Tendered NEA sitting tenant's earnings per hour with the plan's package

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Up from $9.42 an hour, lifting most such hawkers past the assistant's benchmark.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.7.1

  • 26%

    Tendered NEA stalls below the assistant's wage with the package (from 67%)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The package, with the Buying Circles, the fee reset and the named deputy, cuts the share of tendered NEA hawkers earning less per hour than their assistant by more than half.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Follow the Plate, D.4

  • 3.5 to 5.3 years

    Time for the 8% rule to retire a busy stall's goodwill (12–18 months of profit)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The Succession Mortgage's 8% of takings fits a stall with a queue.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Succession Economics, E.1 · §4.3

  • $1,756

    Successor's monthly income at typical takings under the original 8% rule, before the family royalty

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Below the $2,220 assistant benchmark, which is why Succession Economics, E.1's cap was adopted in §4.3.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.1 · Succession Economics, E.1

Money map

  • $3,542M

    Diners pay

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Annual spending by diners at the 14,400 cooked-food stalls in the model.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $1,577M

    Ingredient suppliers

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The largest single flow: ingredients take about 45% of every dollar.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $193M

    Landlords: Government (NEA, HDB)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Rent and fees the state collects as landlord, in the model.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2 · Follow the Plate, D.2.2

  • $148M

    Landlords: centre and coffeeshop operators

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Rent and fees kept by operators who sublet stalls.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $251M

    Landlords: private property owners

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Rent paid to private owners of coffeeshops and malls.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • 17%

    Landlords together take

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Government, operators and private owners combined.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $522M

    Assistants' wages

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Wages for stall assistants, modelled at one assistant on the PWM benchmark plus part-time help per stall.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $170M

    Utilities

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Electricity, gas and water across the modelled stalls.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $92M

    Delivery platforms and payment providers

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Delivery commissions, payment fees and app discounts.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $127M

    Centre services and other running costs

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Cleaning and conservancy services, licences, insurance, packaging and equipment upkeep.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • $462M

    Hawker households

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    What the families at the wok keep, before MediSave and tax.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2

  • about $89M

    Rent and conservancy fees from cooked-food stalls attributed to NEA

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Consistent with published medians of $1,450 non-subsidised and $192–$384 subsidised rent, with 2025 S&CC of about $200.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2 · Sources: Rents and fees, 2025 medians (MSE written reply, 8 Sep 2026) · Primary source

  • about $94M

    HDB-rented coffeeshop stall rents attributed to HDB

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Less than HDB's tender receipts, which imply roughly $230M a year if typical of all 400 HDB coffeeshops.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2

  • roughly $215 million a year

    HDB coffeeshop tender receipts, if the 22 recent tenders (about $48,000 a month) are typical of all 374 HDB-rented coffeeshops

    derived2026-10

    Operators fund the gap between tender rents and stall rents from their own drinks and food counters.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2 · Sources: Eating-house PQM tender results · Primary source

  • between $193M and about $314M a year

    What Government collects from the trade as landlord

    derived2026-10

    Against about $13 million in direct rent support in July 2026.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2

  • about $13 million

    Direct rent support in July 2026

    official2026-07

    What the state paid back to hawkers as rent support, set against the rent it collects.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2 · Sources: Support for stallholders (rent support); July 2026 rental support for hawkers · Primary source

  • roughly $3–4 billion

    Operating receipts of cafés, food courts and other eating places (2021)

    derived2021

    One of two official totals the model's $3.5bn is checked against; neither isolates hawker stalls.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.1 · Sources: Food & beverage services infographic · Primary source

  • $491 a month

    Resident households' spending at hawker centres, food courts and coffee shops (HES 2023)

    official2023

    About $8.8 billion a year across 1.49 million households, drinks included.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.1 · Follow the Plate, D.7.3 · Sources: Household Expenditure Survey 2023 · Primary source

Hours sensitivity

  • $11.45

    Tendered NEA hawker's hourly earnings at an 11-hour day

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The per-hour finding depends on hours, the least measured number in the trade; at 10 hours it is $12.25, and the break-even is about 10 hours.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4

Rent sensitivity

  • $610

    Rent above which a typical tendered hawker earns less than the assistant's benchmark, without the package

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Below the $11.64-an-hour benchmark at any rent above this, so the finding holds at all three quoted NEA rents; the rent only decides by how much.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1 · §2.2

  • $2,450

    Rent up to which a typical tendered hawker with the package still earns more than the assistant's benchmark

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Well above the highest quoted NEA rent, so with the package the typical stall stays sound across the range; about $2,300 without the named deputy.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1 · §2.2

  • $2,150

    Rent up to which a typical tendered hawker with the package, but without the named deputy, still earns more than the assistant's benchmark

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    If NEA does not allow the named deputy (§2.7), the package still carries the typical stall past the benchmark across the quoted range.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1 · §2.2 · §2.7

  • $1,810

    Rent above which the successor's $1,500 protected income starts to bind

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Below this, a typical successor keeps more than $1,500 a month after the Succession Mortgage payment; above it the payment shrinks and the term lengthens.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1 · §2.2 · §4.3

  • $2,450

    Rent at which the successor's payment stops altogether

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    At this rent the successor's own profit is down to the protected $1,500, so no payment is due.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1

  • $4,420

    Rent above which a typical tendered stall makes a loss

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The stall itself is robust: it loses money only far above any quoted NEA rent.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1 · §2.2

  • 66–77%

    Tendered stalls whose hawker earns less than the assistant's benchmark today, across the $1,250–1,800 rent range

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    66% at the $1,250 median rent, 70% at the $1,450 paid in 2025 at centres comparable with the operator-run ones, and 77% at the $1,800 winning bid.

    Sections: §2.2 · Follow the Plate, D.4.1

  • 26–37%

    The same share with the package, across the $1,250–1,800 rent range

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    26% at the $1,250 median rent, 30% at $1,450 and 37% at the $1,800 winning bid.

    Sections: §2.2 · Follow the Plate, D.4.1

  • 0.7% to 2.3%

    Tendered stalls that lose money at the quoted NEA rents ($1,250 to $1,800)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Few stalls lose money at any quoted rent; the risk is below the benchmark, not below zero.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1

  • $18,900

    What a newcomer pays above NEA's valuation before he reaches it, under the November 2024 renewal rule

    derived2026 (model baseline)

    A stall won at the 2023 median bid of $1,800 against a valuation of $1,450: $1,800 a month for three years, $1,625 for the next three and $1,450 from the seventh. Against the $1,250 system median the sum is $29,700.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.4.1 · Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3 · §2.2

  • $372

    What each day shut for illness costs the hawker at the typical tendered stall

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Rent, centre fees, the assistant, utilities and other running costs continue while the stall is shut. Six weeks closed cost about $13,400, 35% of the year's net; a rent waiver saves about $48 a day of it, and a Relief Corps cook on medical leave turns it into the $40 co-pay.

    Sections: Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3 · §2.9 · §2.7

Policy scores

  • 2.17

    Leverage of the Relief-Hawker Corps, tendered NEA stall

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Relief cooks return the most per programme dollar, because a covered day keeps takings a closed day loses.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7 · Follow the Plate, D.7.1

  • $78.7M

    The plan's programmes at national scale, a year

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Most of it is the Makan Voucher line, and the next largest the Protection Floor; the table-cleaning fee subsidy is counted at the three pilot centres only, and its national figure is shown apart as a later decision. The four-year $19.68M budget funds the pilots, not this roll-out. The HDB tender lever pays for the Protection Floor's coffeeshop match and is not added on top.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.4

  • $0.98M

    Table-cleaning fee income the State would give up a year at the three pilot centres, the plan's ask ($200 a stall a month)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Every cooked-food stall at the three pilot centres pays the fee: 408 stalls (Chinatown Complex 226, Geylang Serai 63, Tekka 119), each centre managed by NEA or a Town Council; $1.63M at five, with Old Airport Road and Maxwell. An upper bound: re-priced cleaning contracts would meet part of it.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2 · Follow the Plate, D.7.4 · §2.2 · §7.7

  • $16.6M

    Table-cleaning fee income the State would give up a year if the reset were later made national ($200 a stall a month): a later decision, not part of the plan

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    An upper bound for a decision after the pilot centres: the model books the whole cut as income the fee collector forgoes; operators at operator-run centres would bear about $0.5M more, and re-priced cleaning contracts would meet part of it.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.2.2 · Follow the Plate, D.7.4 · §2.2 · §7.7

  • 1.06

    Return to hawkers and diners per programme dollar, income and savings (1.00 in cash)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Leaving out price freedom, which diners rather than taxpayers fund, the public programmes return 1.24.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.4

  • 1.24

    Return of the public programmes, leaving out price freedom

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Public programmes return about 30 cents more than each programme dollar to hawkers and diners.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.4

  • 2 to 5 times

    How far a $120 voucher covers an eligible household's extra cost if one stall in five raises prices 5%

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    If every stall raised prices 5%, the voucher would cover 41% to 99% of the extra cost.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.3 · §2.5 · Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3

  • 41% to 100%

    Voucher cover if every stall raised prices 5%

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    A heavy user spending $900 a month would be covered 22%.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.3 · §2.5

The retirement match

  • $4.14M

    Protection Floor, base: a $1,200 retirement match for every public-centre stallholder under 55 (at most 3,450 of 6,900 stalls)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The base scope of the one list, the match alone. Hawkers and Social Protection rounds it to about $4.1M. A ceiling: the model counts half of stallholders as under 55. At every age it would be $8.28M.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.5 · §2.11.2 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • $7.92M

    Protection Floor, stretch: every stallholder under 55 at 70% enrolment, with pooled hospital-cash cover ($6.05M match, $1.98M cover)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The stretch scope; Hawkers and Social Protection rounds it to about $8.0M, and Follow the Plate, D.7.4's total uses it. A ceiling: the model counts half of stallholders as under 55. At every age it would be $14.08M.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.5 · Follow the Plate, D.7.4 · §2.11.2 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • $1.7M

    HDB's possible contribution: tender rent forgone under the tender lever, at half take-up of 3,000 HDB-rented stalls

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The upper bound, if operators price in the whole commitment; less if HDB's quality scoring lets them absorb part. It pays for coffeeshop stallholders, so it offsets the stretch only.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.7.5 · Follow the Plate, D.7.4 · §7.7 · §2.4

  • $14.7M

    Retirement match, base: shortfall over Years 4–10 after gifts set aside and Heritage Plate licences

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Giving and licensing cover about 40% of the base; $3.3M a year is still short in Year 10. The remainder is the optional ask of Government.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • $37.0M

    Retirement match, stretch: shortfall over Years 4–10 without HDB's contribution

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Giving and licensing cover about 21% of the stretch.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • $32.4M

    Retirement match, stretch: shortfall over Years 4–10 if HDB agrees to count its forgone tender rent

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    HDB forgoes up to about $1.7M a year of tender rent once all coffeeshops are re-tendered; only its under-55 part, about $0.84M a year, counts towards the match. That raises the stretch's cover to about 31%; the stretch is still about $6.6M a year short in Year 10.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5 · Hawkers and Social Protection, C.8.1

  • 40%

    Share of the base retirement match that giving and Heritage Plate licences could pay, Years 4–10

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    At the central assumptions, with a third of Heritage Plate licensees failing in any year; a Heritage Plate twice the central size would raise it to about 68%, and with no licensee failing it would be 54%.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5

  • 21%

    Share of the stretch retirement match that giving and Heritage Plate licences could pay, Years 4–10

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Without HDB's contribution; 31% with it.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5

  • $2.0M

    Heritage Plate licence income at the central case, from Year 7

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    About $60K in Year 3 (15 licensed outlets); 40% goes to the retirement match, 40% to masters' families and 20% to the Seed Bank. A third of licensed outlets and packaged lines are assumed to fail and pay nothing in any year (most licensed hawker expansions shrank or closed: Chua, IPS, 2024). The outlet numbers, plates an outlet, packaged-goods sales and the failure rate are assumptions.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5 · the Budget Book, B.9.2 · the Budget Book, B.6.1 · §5.5

  • 101%

    Endowment in Year 20, as a share of its target, if half of the surplus gifts are earmarked for the match

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Setting half of the surplus gifts aside for the match leaves the corpus just above its target in Year 20, against 121% with none set aside and 86% with all of it.

    Sections: the Budget Book, B.9.5

Succession stress test

  • 34%

    Successors who quit within five years when there is no payment and no royalty (the control)

    modelled2026-10

    Every simulated hand-over is also run with no payment and no royalty. Some successors quit anyway, for money or personal reasons.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 49%

    Successors who quit within five years, 26 October terms

    modelled2026-10

    The lesser of 8% of gross and 30% of net, a $600 floor, the royalty after payoff, and no protected income. The simulation tracks each successor for five years.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 16%

    Extra successors who quit within five years because of the payment, 26 October terms

    modelled2026-10

    The share who quit beyond the control, where no payment is charged. It measures the burden the payment itself adds.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 4.7

    Median years to retire the goodwill, 26 October terms

    modelled2026-10

    Half of simulated hand-overs pay off sooner than this, and half later.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 84%

    Share of the goodwill sum the retiree recovers on average, 26 October terms

    modelled2026-10

    Counts the successor's payments and the first-loss guarantee.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • $7,500

    Expected first-loss cost per mortgage, averaged across all simulated stalls, 26 October terms

    modelled2026-10

    What the first-loss guarantee costs the programme on average, weaker stalls included.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1 · §4.3

  • 34%

    Successors who quit within five years, 26 October terms with the $1,500 protected income

    modelled2026-10

    The same terms, plus a payment and royalty that never take the successor's monthly profit below $1,500. The simulation tracks each successor for five years.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 0.4%

    Extra successors who quit within five years because of the payment, 26 October terms with the $1,500 protected income

    modelled2026-10

    The share who quit beyond the control, where no payment is charged. It measures the burden the payment itself adds.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 4.9

    Median years to retire the goodwill, 26 October terms with the $1,500 protected income

    modelled2026-10

    Half of simulated hand-overs pay off sooner than this, and half later.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • 85%

    Share of the goodwill sum the retiree recovers on average, 26 October terms with the $1,500 protected income

    modelled2026-10

    Counts the successor's payments and the first-loss guarantee.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • $5,900

    Expected first-loss cost per mortgage, averaged across all simulated stalls, 26 October terms with the $1,500 protected income

    modelled2026-10

    What the first-loss guarantee costs the programme on average, weaker stalls included.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.4 · Succession Economics, E.1 · §4.3

Guarantee reserve

  • $104,000

    Reserve needed to be 95% sure of covering a book of 10 Succession Mortgages (P95 payout)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Expected payout for 10 mortgages is $65,000; the reserve must cover the bad tail, not the average.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • $180,000

    Reserve needed to be 95% sure of covering a book of 20 Succession Mortgages (P95 payout)

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    A realistic pilot book is 5 to 20 mortgages; 20 sits well inside the $310,000 left for losses.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5 · Succession Economics, E.1

  • $22,000

    First-loss payout per mortgage if a 2020-style shock makes every mortgage in its first two years fail at once

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    Against about $6,500 expected; the guarantee would pay up to 24 of the mortgage's scheduled payments.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5 · Succession Economics, E.1.3

  • $440,000

    Crisis payout for a book of 20 mortgages, all in their first two years

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    More than double the book's P95 payout, which is why the reserve should also be sized to the crisis payout where affordable.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5

  • $560,000

    Part of the $660,000 Years 1–3 budget left for losses after escrow set-up and administration

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    The set-up and administration split ($100,000) is an assumption; the plan does not divide the $660,000.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5

  • about 74

    Mortgages the Years 1–3 reserve can safely carry at P95

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    82 if all $660,000 were reserve; growing past about 68 mortgages needs more capital.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5 · Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3

  • about 25

    Mortgages the Years 1–3 reserve can carry through a 2020-style crisis

    modelled2026 (model baseline)

    30 if all $660,000 were reserve; enough for a pilot, where the gate needs six hand-overs.

    Sections: Succession Economics, E.1.5 · Method, Levers and Data, F.2.3

Plate Tracker

  • 3

    of the 21 Plate Tracker indicators that Singapore publishes regularly (11 in part, 7 not at all)

    derived2026-10

    Most of the missing indicators are already held by an agency.

    Sections: Follow the Plate, D.8 · §2.10

Assumptions

This is a working paper for public discussion. Every number in it is an invitation to improve it. Corrections and better data are welcome.